↓ Skip to main content

Harming the Beneficiaries of Humanitarian Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Harming the Beneficiaries of Humanitarian Intervention
Published in
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10677-018-9944-0
Authors

Linda Eggert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,708,028
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#288
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,805
of 347,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.