| Title |
Development and validation of a delayed presenting clubfoot score to predict the response to Ponseti casting for children aged 2–10
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11751-018-0324-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. R. Nunn, M. Etsub, T. Tilahun, R. O. E. Gardner, V. Allgar, A. M. Wainwright, C. B. D. Lavy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 64% |
| South Africa | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,919,809
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
#3
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,365
of 343,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them