↓ Skip to main content

IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Immunology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
19 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
1335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
880 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA
Published in
Nature Immunology, October 2010
DOI 10.1038/ni.1932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonie Unterholzner, Sinead E Keating, Marcin Baran, Kristy A Horan, Søren B Jensen, Shruti Sharma, Cherilyn M Sirois, Tengchuan Jin, Eicke Latz, T Sam Xiao, Katherine A Fitzgerald, Søren R Paludan, Andrew G Bowie

Abstract

The detection of intracellular microbial DNA is critical to appropriate innate immune responses; however, knowledge of how such DNA is sensed is limited. Here we identify IFI16, a PYHIN protein, as an intracellular DNA sensor that mediates the induction of interferon-β (IFN-β). IFI16 directly associated with IFN-β-inducing viral DNA motifs. STING, a critical mediator of IFN-β responses to DNA, was recruited to IFI16 after DNA stimulation. Lowering the expression of IFI16 or its mouse ortholog p204 by RNA-mediated interference inhibited gene induction and activation of the transcription factors IRF3 and NF-κB induced by DNA and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). IFI16 (p204) is the first PYHIN protein to our knowledge shown to be involved in IFN-β induction. Thus, the PYHIN proteins IFI16 and AIM2 form a new family of innate DNA sensors we call 'AIM2-like receptors' (ALRs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 880 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
France 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 842 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 253 29%
Researcher 135 15%
Student > Bachelor 117 13%
Student > Master 87 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 124 14%
Unknown 123 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 322 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 154 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 117 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 10%
Neuroscience 15 2%
Other 54 6%
Unknown 134 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,294,113
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#835
of 4,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,073
of 110,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.