↓ Skip to main content

Refuge sharing network predicts ectoparasite load in a lizard

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Refuge sharing network predicts ectoparasite load in a lizard
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00265-010-0964-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan T. Leu, Peter M. Kappeler, C. Michael Bull

Abstract

Living in social groups facilitates cross-infection by parasites. However, empirical studies on indirect transmission within wildlife populations are scarce. We investigated whether asynchronous overnight refuge sharing among neighboring sleepy lizards, Tiliqua rugosa, facilitates indirect transmission of its ectoparasitic tick, Amblyomma limbatum. We fitted 18 neighboring lizards with GPS recorders, observed their overnight refuge use each night over 3 months, and counted their ticks every fortnight. We constructed a transmission network to estimate the cross-infection risk based on asynchronous refuge sharing frequencies among all lizards and the life history traits of the tick. Although self-infection was possible, the network provided a powerful predictor of measured tick loads. Highly connected lizards that frequently used their neighbors' refuges were characterized by higher tick loads. Thus, indirect contact had a major influence on transmission pathways and parasite loads. Furthermore, lizards that used many different refuges had lower cross- and self-infection risks and lower tick loads than individuals that used relatively fewer refuges. Increasing the number of refuges used by a lizard may be an important defense mechanism against ectoparasite transmission in this species. Our study provides important empirical data to further understand how indirectly transmitted parasites move through host populations and influence individual parasite loads.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Brazil 2 2%
South Africa 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 109 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 30%
Researcher 31 25%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 60%
Environmental Science 13 10%
Psychology 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2010.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2,492
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,351
of 96,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.