| Title |
Improvement in diagnostic delays over time in patients with hereditary angioedema: findings from the Icatibant Outcome Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-018-0229-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Zanichelli, Markus Magerl, Hilary J. Longhurst, Werner Aberer, Teresa Caballero, Laurence Bouillet, Anette Bygum, Anete S. Grumach, Jaco Botha, Irmgard Andresen, Marcus Maurer, IOS Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 4 | 20% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Jordan | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,137,899
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#206
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,243
of 347,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.