Title |
The drivers and methodologies for exploiting wild Cajanus genome in pigeonpea breeding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Euphytica, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10681-018-2298-9 |
Authors |
K. B. Saxena, R. K. Saxena, S. Sharma, C. V. Sameer Kumar, R. Sultana, E. B. von Wettberg, R. K. Varshney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 40% |
Germany | 1 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 40% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,005,186
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#297
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,829
of 343,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.