You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-based practice education for healthcare professions: an expert view
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine Lehane, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Cliona O’Riordan, Eileen Savage, Jonathan Drennan, Colm O’Tuathaigh, Michael O’Connor, Mark Corrigan, Francis Burke, Martina Hayes, Helen Lynch, Laura Sahm, Elizabeth Heffernan, Elizabeth O’Keeffe, Catherine Blake, Frances Horgan, Josephine Hegarty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 32% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 37% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 676 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 93 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 35 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 122 | 18% |
| Unknown | 273 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 173 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 83 | 12% |
| Unknown | 288 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,663,301
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#206
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,274
of 354,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.