↓ Skip to main content

Female Sex Development and Reproductive Duct Formation Depend on Wnt4a in Zebrafish

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Female Sex Development and Reproductive Duct Formation Depend on Wnt4a in Zebrafish
Published in
Genetics, November 2018
DOI 10.1534/genetics.118.301620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle E Kossack, Samantha K High, Rachel E Hopton, Yi-lin Yan, John H Postlethwait, Bruce W Draper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 17%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,333,446
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics
#1,255
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,697
of 336,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics
#27
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.