| Title |
Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40271-018-0346-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Norman, Benjamin M. Craig, Paul Hansen, Marcel F. Jonker, John Rose, Deborah J. Street, Brendan Mulhern |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 45% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 29% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 29% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,757,930
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#162
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,092
of 313,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.