Title |
Injuries to the Chopart joint complex: a current review
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00590-017-1958-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Halah Kutaish, R. Stern, L. Drittenbass, M. Assal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,578,554
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#155
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,144
of 310,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.