↓ Skip to main content

Tilia trees: toxic or valuable resources for pollinators?

Overview of attention for article published in Apidologie, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Tilia trees: toxic or valuable resources for pollinators?
Published in
Apidologie, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13592-018-0581-3
Authors

Anne-Laure Jacquemart, Laura Moquet, Pierre Ouvrard, Joëlle Quetin-Leclercq, Marie-France Hérent, Muriel Quinet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 52%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,040,656
of 23,940,484 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#187
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,831
of 332,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.