You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sterilization Effects of Electronic Range on Various Foodstuffs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 1967
|
| DOI | 10.3136/nskkk1962.14.545 |
| Authors |
KAIO KOIZUMI, MASAKO SATO, TUNEKO TAKE, HITOSHI OTSUKA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 45% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,810,859
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#7
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100
of 11,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them