↓ Skip to main content

High-resolution mapping of the S-locus in Turnera leads to the discovery of three genes tightly associated with the S-alleles

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
High-resolution mapping of the S-locus in Turnera leads to the discovery of three genes tightly associated with the S-alleles
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00438-009-0439-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan J. D. Labonne, Alina Goultiaeva, Joel S. Shore

Abstract

While the breeding system known as distyly has been used as a model system in genetics, and evolutionary biology for over a century, the genes determining this system remain unknown. To positionally clone genes determining distyly, a high-resolution map of the S-locus region of Turnera has been constructed using segregation data from 2,013 backcross progeny. We discovered three putative genes tightly linked with the S-locus. An N-acetyltransferase (TkNACE) flanks the S-locus at 0.35 cM while a sulfotransferase (TkST1) and a non-LTR retroelement (TsRETRO) show complete linkage to the S-locus. An assay of population samples of six species revealed that TsRETRO, initially discovered in diploid Turnera subulata, is also associated with the S-allele in tetraploid T. subulata and diploid Turnera scabra. The sulfotransferase gene shows some level of differential expression in long versus short styles, indicating it might be involved in some aspect of distyly. The complete linkage of TkST1 and TsRETRO to the S-locus suggests that both genes may reside within, or in the immediate vicinity of the S-locus. Chromosome walking has been initiated using one of the genes discovered in the present study to identify the genes determining distyly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2009.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#2,751
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,092
of 109,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.