| Title |
Strategies to Reduce Acute Kidney Injury and Improve Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Subgroup Analysis of the PRESERVE Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.044 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Santiago Garcia, Deepak L. Bhatt, Martin Gallagher, Hani Jneid, James Kaufman, Paul M. Palevsky, Hongsheng Wu, Steven D. Weisbord, PRESERVE Trial Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 23% |
| Mexico | 6 | 6% |
| Brazil | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 14% |
| Scientists | 11 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#773,833
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#212
of 4,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,698
of 367,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#6
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.