| Title |
Women in Medicine Addressing the Gender Gap in Interventional Cardiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonya Burgess, Elizabeth Shaw, Katherine Ellenberger, Liza Thomas, Cindy Grines, Sarah Zaman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 77 | 30% |
| Australia | 48 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 8% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Denmark | 3 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 165 | 63% |
| Scientists | 47 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#190,756
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#428
of 17,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,823
of 367,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#13
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.