↓ Skip to main content

Exploring patient information needs in type 2 diabetes: A cross sectional study of questions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring patient information needs in type 2 diabetes: A cross sectional study of questions
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0203429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen E. Crangle, Colin Bradley, Paul F. Carlin, Robert J. Esterhay, Roy Harper, Patricia M. Kearney, Vera J. C. McCarthy, Michael F. McTear, Eileen Savage, Mark S. Tuttle, Jonathan G. Wallace

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 24 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,540,789
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#176,184
of 197,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,339
of 310,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,935
of 3,237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.