↓ Skip to main content

Combined mechanisms of neural firing rate homeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Combined mechanisms of neural firing rate homeostasis
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00422-018-0768-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Miller, Jonathan Cannon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 33%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 27%
Engineering 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Philosophy 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,552,610
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#506
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,139
of 329,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them