↓ Skip to main content

Paper-Based Biochip Assays and Recent Developments: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in BioChip Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Paper-Based Biochip Assays and Recent Developments: A Review
Published in
BioChip Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13206-017-2101-3
Authors

Moonseong Park, Byoung-Hoon Kang, Ki-Hun Jeong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 25%
Chemistry 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Materials Science 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,885,470
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from BioChip Journal
#83
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,497
of 352,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioChip Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them