↓ Skip to main content

Suitability of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antibodies for immunohistochemistry evaluated on tissue sections of receptor gene-deficient mice

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Suitability of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antibodies for immunohistochemistry evaluated on tissue sections of receptor gene-deficient mice
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00210-008-0365-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gitte Jositsch, Tamara Papadakis, Rainer V. Haberberger, Miriam Wolff, Jürgen Wess, Wolfgang Kummer

Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh) is a major regulator of visceral function exerting pharmacologically relevant effects upon smooth muscle tone and epithelial function via five types of muscarinic receptors (M1R-M5R). In this paper, we assessed the specificity of muscarinic receptor (MR) antibodies in immunohistochemical labelling on tissue sections by analysing specimens from wild-type and respective gene-deficient mice. Of 24 antibodies evaluated in this study, 16 were tested at 18 different conditions each, and eight of them in 21 different protocols, resulting in a total number of 456 antibody/protocol combinations. Each of them was tested at four antibody dilutions at minimum, so that finally, at least 1,824 conditions were evaluated. For each of them, dorsal root ganglia, urinary bladder and cross-sections through all thoracic viscera were investigated. In all cases where the antigen was available, at least one incubation condition was identified in which only select cell types were immunolabelled in the positive control but remained unlabelled in the pre-absorption control. With two exceptions (M2R antibodies), however, all antibodies produced identical immunohistochemical labelling patterns in tissues taken from corresponding gene-deficient mice even when the pre-absorption control in wild-type mice suggested specificity. Hence, the present data demonstrate the unpleasant fact that reliable immunohistochemical localisation of MR subtypes with antibodies is the exception rather than the rule. Immunohistochemical detection of MR subtype localisation in tissue sections of peripheral organs is limited to the M2R subtype utilising the most commonly used methodological approaches.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2010.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1,336
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,023
of 92,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.