↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive screening of copy number variability in dementia with Lewy bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive screening of copy number variability in dementia with Lewy bodies
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Kun-Rodrigues, Tatiana Orme, Susana Carmona, Dena G Hernandez, Owen A Ross, John D Eicher, Claire Shepherd, Laura Parkkinen, Lee Darwent, Michael G Heckman, Sonja W Scholz, Juan C Troncoso, Olga Pletnikova, Ted Dawson, Liana Rosenthal, Olaf Ansorge, Jordi Clarimon, Alberto Lleo, Estrella Morenas-Rodriguez, Lorraine Clark, Lawrence S Honig, Karen Marder, Afina Lemstra, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Peter St George-Hyslop, Elisabet Londos, Henrik Zetterberg, Imelda Barber, Anne Braae, Kristelle Brown, Kevin Morgan, Claire Troakes, Safa Al-Sarraj, Tammaryn Lashley, Janice Holton, Yaroslau Compta, Vivianna Van Deerlin, Geidy E Serrano, Thomas G Beach, Suzanne Lesage, Douglas Galasko, Eliezer Masliah, Isabel Santana, Pau Pastor, Monica Diez-Fairen, Miquel Aguilar, Pentti J Tienari, Liisa Myllykangas, Minna Oinas, Tamas Revesz, Andrew Lees, Brad F Boeve, Ronald C Petersen, Tanis J Ferman, Valentina Escott-Price, Neill Graff-Radford, Nigel J Cairns, John C Morris, Stuart Pickering-Brown, David Mann, Glenda M Halliday, John Hardy, John Q Trojanowski, Dennis W Dickson, Andrew Singleton, David J Stone, Rita Guerreiro, Jose Bras

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 28 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,801,943
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#728
of 4,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,503
of 366,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#17
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.