| Title |
Influence of Age on the Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer for Men and the Development of Second Primary Cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-6767-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia A. Cronin, Anya Romanoff, Emily C. Zabor, Michelle Stempel, Anne Eaton, Lillian M. Smyth, Alice Y. Ho, Monica Morrow, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Mary L. Gemignani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 53% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,975,809
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,188
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,982
of 346,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#29
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.