You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BAFopathies’ DNA methylation epi-signatures demonstrate diagnostic utility and functional continuum of Coffin–Siris and Nicolaides–Baraitser syndromes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-07193-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erfan Aref-Eshghi, Eric G. Bend, Rebecca L. Hood, Laila C. Schenkel, Deanna Alexis Carere, Rana Chakrabarti, Sandesh C. S. Nagamani, Sau Wai Cheung, Philippe M. Campeau, Chitra Prasad, Victoria Mok Siu, Lauren Brady, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, David J. Callen, A. Micheil Innes, Susan M. White, Wendy S. Meschino, Andrew Y. Shuen, Guillaume Paré, Dennis E. Bulman, Peter J. Ainsworth, Hanxin Lin, David I. Rodenhiser, Raoul C. Hennekam, Kym M. Boycott, Charles E. Schwartz, Bekim Sadikovic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| China | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,677,931
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#27,362
of 48,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,747
of 438,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#778
of 1,321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.