↓ Skip to main content

Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court’s Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court’s Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition
Published in
Drugs, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian K. Chen, Y. Tony Yang, Charles L. Bennett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,037,028
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#81
of 3,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,422
of 339,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.