You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Manufacturing classification system in the real world: factors influencing manufacturing process choices for filed commercial oral solid dosage formulations, case studies from industry and considerations for continuous processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Development & Technology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10837450.2018.1534863 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Leane, Kendal Pitt, Gavin K. Reynolds, Neil Dawson, Iris Ziegler, Aniko Szepes, Abina M. Crean, Rafaela Dall Agnol, The Manufacturing Classification System Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 79 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 39 | 20% |
| Chemical Engineering | 24 | 12% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 91 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Development & Technology
#410
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,757
of 355,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Development & Technology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.