You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Marine natural products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Product Reports, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1039/b805113p |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John W. Blunt, Brent R. Copp, Wan-Ping Hu, Murray H. G. Munro, Peter T. Northcote, Michèle R. Prinsep |
| Abstract |
This review covers the literature published in 2007 for marine natural products, with 948 citations(627 for the period January to December 2007) referring to compounds isolated from marine microorganisms and phytoplankton, green algae, brown algae, red algae, sponges, cnidarians,bryozoans, molluscs, tunicates, echinoderms and true mangrove plants. The emphasis is on new compounds (961 for 2007), together with the relevant biological activities, source organisms and country of origin. Biosynthetic studies, first syntheses, and syntheses that lead to the revision of structures or stereochemistries, have been included.1 Introduction, 2 Reviews, 3 Marine microorganisms and phytoplankton, 4 Green algae, 5 Brown algae, 6 Red algae, 7 Sponges, 8 Cnidarians, 9 Bryozoans, 10 Molluscs, 11 Tunicates (ascidians),12 Echinoderms, 13 Miscellaneous, 14 Conclusion, 15 References. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 479 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 446 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 119 | 25% |
| Researcher | 69 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 145 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 138 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Unknown | 71 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,131,152
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Natural Product Reports
#173
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,070
of 183,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Product Reports
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.