You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Degrees of population-level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non-volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cat (Felis catus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Research, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1071/wr18008 |
| Authors |
James Q. Radford, John C. Z. Woinarski, Sarah Legge, Marcus Baseler, Joss Bentley, Andrew A. Burbidge, Michael Bode, Peter Copley, Nicholas Dexter, Chris R. Dickman, Graeme Gillespie, Brydie Hill, Chris N. Johnson, John Kanowski, Peter Latch, Mike Letnic, Adrian Manning, Peter Menkhorst, Nicola Mitchell, Keith Morris, Katherine Moseby, Manda Page, Jeremy Ringma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#421,413
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#33
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,209
of 446,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.