↓ Skip to main content

Ethanol May Suppress Wnt/β-catenin Signaling on Human Bone Marrow Stroma Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Ethanol May Suppress Wnt/β-catenin Signaling on Human Bone Marrow Stroma Cells
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0171-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-Hua Yeh, Je-Ken Chang, Yan-Hsiung Wang, Mei-Ling Ho, Gwo-Jaw Wang

Abstract

Ethanol and glucocorticoids are risk factors associated with osteonecrosis. Previous reports suggest ethanol and glucocorticoids induce adipogenesis, decrease osteogenesis in bone marrow stroma cells, and produce intracellular lipid deposits resulting in death of osteocytes. The Wnt/beta-catenin signal pathway is involved in the regulation of homeostasis of bone and we presume glucocorticoids and ethanol may induce osteonecrosis in humans through a similar mechanism as in rodents. We hypothesized (1) ethanol, like glucocorticoids, decreases osteogenesis and increases adipogenesis through the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in human bone marrow stromal cells; and (2) ethanol decreases intranuclear translocation of beta-catenin. We found both dexamethasone and ethanol decrease the gene and protein expression of osteogenesis and increase that of adipogenesis through Wnt signaling-related genes by semiquantitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. Ethanol hampered intranuclear translocation of beta-catenin by immunofluorescence analysis. The data suggest the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway may be associated with ethanol-induced osteonecrosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,030
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,393
of 96,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#17
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.