↓ Skip to main content

Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial
Published in
Appetite, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Pechey, Emma Cartwright, Mark Pilling, Gareth J. Hollands, Milica Vasiljevic, Susan A. Jebb, Theresa M. Marteau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Lecturer 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Psychology 14 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 42 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,401,511
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#832
of 4,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,197
of 447,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#12
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.