You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Striped hyenas as bone modifiers in dual human-to-carnivore experimental models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-018-0747-y |
| Authors |
Mari Carmen Arriaza, Elia Organista, José Yravedra, Manuel Santonja, Enrique Baquedano, Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 44% |
| South Africa | 2 | 13% |
| Portugal | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Grenada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,333,675
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#280
of 973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,530
of 357,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.