| Title |
Erythromycin versus metoclopramide for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: a randomized non-inferiority trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5466-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bei Hu, Xin Ouyang, Liming Lei, Cheng Sun, Ruibin Chi, Jian Guo, Wenlong Guo, Yanlin Zhang, Yong Li, Daoyong Huang, Huafeng Sun, Zhiqiang Nie, Jieyang Yu, Yuan Zhou, Hao Wang, Jinhe Zhang, Chunbo Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,100,364
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,551
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,965
of 435,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#38
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.