↓ Skip to main content

High-resolution phylogenetic microbial community profiling

Overview of attention for article published in The ISME Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
69 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
570 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-resolution phylogenetic microbial community profiling
Published in
The ISME Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/ismej.2015.249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Singer, Brian Bushnell, Devin Coleman-Derr, Brett Bowman, Robert M Bowers, Asaf Levy, Esther A Gies, Jan-Fang Cheng, Alex Copeland, Hans-Peter Klenk, Steven J Hallam, Philip Hugenholtz, Susannah G Tringe, Tanja Woyke

Abstract

Over the past decade, high-throughput short-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing has eclipsed clone-dependent long-read Sanger sequencing for microbial community profiling. The transition to new technologies has provided more quantitative information at the expense of taxonomic resolution with implications for inferring metabolic traits in various ecosystems. We applied single-molecule real-time sequencing for microbial community profiling, generating full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences at high throughput, which we propose to name PhyloTags. We benchmarked and validated this approach using a defined microbial community. When further applied to samples from the water column of meromictic Sakinaw Lake, we show that while community structures at the phylum level are comparable between PhyloTags and Illumina V4 16S rRNA gene sequences (iTags), variance increases with community complexity at greater water depths. PhyloTags moreover allowed less ambiguous classification. Last, a platform-independent comparison of PhyloTags and in silico generated partial 16S rRNA gene sequences demonstrated significant differences in community structure and phylogenetic resolution across multiple taxonomic levels, including a severe underestimation in the abundance of specific microbial genera involved in nitrogen and methane cycling across the Lake's water column. Thus, PhyloTags provide a reliable adjunct or alternative to cost-effective iTags, enabling more accurate phylogenetic resolution of microbial communities and predictions on their metabolic potential.The ISME Journal advance online publication, 9 February 2016; doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.249.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 536 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 143 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 21%
Student > Master 63 11%
Student > Bachelor 43 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 93 16%
Unknown 79 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 230 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 102 18%
Environmental Science 47 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 38 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 2%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 103 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#687,721
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#195
of 3,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,778
of 410,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#8
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.