| Title |
Is ‘health equity’ bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers’ perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Public Health, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.17269/s41997-018-0128-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxwell J. Smith, Alison Thompson, Ross E. G. Upshur |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 18 | 62% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 48% |
| Scientists | 9 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,309,040
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#121
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,013
of 449,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Public Health
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.