↓ Skip to main content

Ecological stoichiometry of indirect grazer effects on periphyton nutrient content

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Ecological stoichiometry of indirect grazer effects on periphyton nutrient content
Published in
Oecologia, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0930-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut Hillebrand, Paul Frost, Antonia Liess

Abstract

Ecological stoichiometry has been successful in enhancing our understanding of trophic interactions between consumer and prey species. Consumer and prey dynamics have been shown to depend on the nutrient composition of the prey relative to the nutrient demand of the consumer. Since most experiments on this topic used a single consumer species, little is known about the validity of stoichiometric constraints on trophic interactions across consumers and ecosystems. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis on grazer-periphyton experiments to test (1) if benthic grazers have consistent effects on the nutrient composition of their prey, and (2) whether these effects can be aligned to the nutrient stoichiometry of grazer and periphyton, other environmental factors, or experimental constraints. Grazers significantly lowered periphyton C:N and C:P ratios, indicating higher N- and P-content of grazed periphyton across studies. Grazer presence on average increased periphyton N:P ratios, but across studies the effect size did not differ significantly from zero. The sign and strength of grazer effects on periphyton nutrient ratios was strongly dependent on the nutrient content of grazers and their food, but also on grazer biomass, the amount of biomass removal and water column nutrients. Grazer with low P-content tended to reduce periphyton P-content, whereas grazers with high P-content increased periphyton P-content. This result suggests that low grazer P-content can be an indication of physiological P-limitation rather than a result of having relatively low and fixed P-requirements. At the across-system scale of this meta-analysis, predictions from stoichiometric theory are corroborated, but the plasticity of the consumer nutrient composition has to be acknowledged.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Poland 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 127 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 26%
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 50%
Environmental Science 37 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2007.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,248
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,612
of 155,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.