| Title |
A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Constantin M. Durnea, Vasilios Pergialiotis, James M. N. Duffy, Lina Bergstrom, Abdullatif Elfituri, Stergios K. Doumouchtsis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 56% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,222,505
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#300
of 2,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,265
of 364,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.