| Title |
Evaluating prepared core assemblages with three-dimensional methods: a case study from the Middle Paleolithic at Skhūl (Israel)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-018-0746-z |
| Authors |
Kathryn L. Ranhorn, David R. Braun, Rebecca E. Biermann Gürbüz, Elliot Greiner, Daniel Wawrzyniak, Alison S. Brooks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| South Africa | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Portugal | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 56% |
| Scientists | 16 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,760,571
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#118
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,809
of 448,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.