↓ Skip to main content

Nerve Growth Factor Antagonists: Is the Future of Monoclonal Antibodies Becoming Clearer?

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Nerve Growth Factor Antagonists: Is the Future of Monoclonal Antibodies Becoming Clearer?
Published in
Drugs, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40265-017-0781-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Bannwarth, Marie Kostine

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,579,758
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,346
of 3,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,469
of 315,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.