↓ Skip to main content

Lower capacitance response and capillary fluid absorption in women to defend central blood volume in response to acute hypovolemic circulatory stress

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lower capacitance response and capillary fluid absorption in women to defend central blood volume in response to acute hypovolemic circulatory stress
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, June 2008
DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00332.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Lindenberger, H. Olsen, T. Länne

Abstract

Acute hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in trauma, and women are more susceptible to hypovolemic circulatory stress than men. The mechanisms underlying the susceptibility are not clear, however. The aim of the present study was to examine the compensatory mechanisms to defend central blood volume during experimental hypovolemia in women and men. Twenty-two women (23.1 +/- 0.4 yr) and 16 men (23.2 +/- 0.5 yr) were included. A lower body negative pressure (LBNP) of 11-44 mmHg induced experimental hypovolemic circulatory stress. The volumetric technique was used to assess the capacitance response (redistribution of peripheral venous blood to the central circulation) as well as to assess net capillary fluid transfer from tissue to blood in the arm. Plasma norepinephrine (NE) and forearm blood flow were measured before and during hypovolemia, and forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was calculated. LBNP created comparable hypovolemia in women and men. FVR increased less in women during hypovolemic stress, and no association between plasma NE and FVR was seen in women (R(2) = 0.01, not significant), in contrast to men (R(2) = 0.59, P < 0.05). Women demonstrated a good initial capacitance response, but this was not maintained with time, in contrast to men [e.g., decreased by 24 +/- 4% (women) vs. 4 +/- 5% (men), LBNP of 44 mmHg, P < 0.01], and net capillary fluid absorption from tissue to blood was lower in women (0.086 +/- 0.007 vs. 0.115 +/- 0.011 ml.100 ml(-1).min(-1), P < 0.05). In conclusion, women showed impaired vasoconstriction, reduced capacitance response with time, and reduced capillary fluid absorption during acute hypovolemic circulatory stress, indicating less efficiency to defend central blood volume than men.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Vietnam 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 22%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Neuroscience 4 22%
Psychology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2008.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#2,959
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,561
of 96,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.