↓ Skip to main content

Review of Vegetative Branching in the Palms (Arecaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Review of Vegetative Branching in the Palms (Arecaceae)
Published in
The Botanical Review, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12229-018-9200-2
Authors

Sara M. Edelman, Jennifer H. Richards

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 63%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,127,435
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#289
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,404
of 333,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.