You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Diets, Familial History, and Alternative Therapies on Genomic Instability of Breast Cancer Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12010-018-2918-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Márcia Fernanda Correia Jardim Paz, Antônio Luiz Gomes Júnior, Marcus Vinícius Oliveira Barros de Alencar, Shams Tabrez, Muhammad Torequl Islam, Nasimudeen R. Jabir, Mohammad Oves, Mohammad Zubair Alam, Muhammad Nadeem Asghar, Eunüs S. Ali, Keylla da Conceição Machado, Kátia da Conceição Machado, Felipe Cavalcanti Carneiro da Silva, André Luiz Pinho Sobral, João Marcelo de Castro e Sousa, Germano Pinho de Moraes, Siddhartha Kumar Mishra, Juliana da Silva, Ana Amélia de Carvalho Melo-Cavalcante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,552,610
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1,569
of 2,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,176
of 343,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.