↓ Skip to main content

Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, February 2016
DOI 10.1098/rspa.2015.0712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Shyy, Chang-kwon Kang, Pakpong Chirarattananon, Sridhar Ravi, Hao Liu

Abstract

There are nearly a million known species of flying insects and 13 000 species of flying warm-blooded vertebrates, including mammals, birds and bats. While in flight, their wings not only move forward relative to the air, they also flap up and down, plunge and sweep, so that both lift and thrust can be generated and balanced, accommodate uncertain surrounding environment, with superior flight stability and dynamics with highly varied speeds and missions. As the size of a flyer is reduced, the wing-to-body mass ratio tends to decrease as well. Furthermore, these flyers use integrated system consisting of wings to generate aerodynamic forces, muscles to move the wings, and sensing and control systems to guide and manoeuvre. In this article, recent advances in insect-scale flapping-wing aerodynamics, flexible wing structures, unsteady flight environment, sensing, stability and control are reviewed with perspective offered. In particular, the special features of the low Reynolds number flyers associated with small sizes, thin and light structures, slow flight with comparable wind gust speeds, bioinspired fabrication of wing structures, neuron-based sensing and adaptive control are highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 26%
Student > Master 50 19%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 139 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 12%
Physics and Astronomy 12 5%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 58 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,305,492
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#2,419
of 3,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,493
of 407,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.