↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Split Intracardiac Potentials Marker of Cardiac Inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Split Intracardiac Potentials Marker of Cardiac Inflammation
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.05.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhijeet B. Shelke, Sachin Yalagudri, Calambur Narasimhan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,305,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#1,098
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,710
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#34
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.