↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic
Published in
Neuroethics, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12152-016-9250-2
Authors

Kentaro Fujita, Jessica J. Carnevale, Yaacov Trope

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 43%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Philosophy 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,221,067
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,653
of 299,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.