↓ Skip to main content

Antithrombotic Drug Use, Cerebral Microbleeds, and Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
254 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antithrombotic Drug Use, Cerebral Microbleeds, and Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Published in
Stroke, April 2010
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.109.572594
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline E. Lovelock, Charlotte Cordonnier, Hiromitsu Naka, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Cathie L.M. Sudlow, Takatoshi Sorimachi, David J. Werring, Simone M. Gregoire, Toshio Imaizumi, Seung-Hoon Lee, Dennis Briley, Peter M. Rothwell

Abstract

Cerebral microbleeds (MB) are potential risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but it is unclear if they are a contraindication to using antithrombotic drugs. Insights could be gained by pooling data on MB frequency stratified by antithrombotic use in cohorts with ICH and ischemic stroke (IS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 3%
Netherlands 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 142 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Other 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 38 25%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 64%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 2 1%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#6,147
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,806
of 104,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#28
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.