| Title |
Postoperative laryngoscopy in thyroid surgery: proper timing to detect recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00423-009-0581-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Luigi Boni, Francesca Rovera, Stefano Rausei, Paolo Castelnuovo, Renzo Dionigi |
| Abstract |
There is currently a lack of consensus to support the proper timing for postoperative laryngoscopy that is reliable to diagnose recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) after thyroid surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different time intervals of fiber-optic nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) on the diagnosis of RLNP. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2010.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#632
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,406
of 163,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.