↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema—Comparison of Physical Measurement Methods and Self-Report

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Investigation, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema—Comparison of Physical Measurement Methods and Self-Report
Published in
Cancer Investigation, November 2009
DOI 10.3109/07357900902918494
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. A. Czerniec, L. C. Ward, K. M. Refshauge, J. Beith, M. J. Lee, S. York, S. L. Kilbreath

Abstract

To determine the relationship between physical methods of measuring lymphedema and self-reported swelling, their reliability, and standard error of measurement.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Engineering 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2011.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Investigation
#587
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,585
of 78,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Investigation
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.