You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional Cardiac Orexin Receptors: Role of Orexin-B/Orexin 2 Receptor in Myocardial Protection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1042/cs20180150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanlata H. Patel, Emmanouil Karteris, Jing Chen, Ioannis Kyrou, Harman S. Mattu, Georgios K. Dimitriadis, Glenn Rodrigo, Charalambos Antoniades, Alexios Antonopoulos, Bee K. Tan, Edward W. Hillhouse, Andre Ng, Harpal S. Randeva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Science
#2,141
of 2,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,855
of 451,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Science
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.