↓ Skip to main content

Tailoring screening protocols for perinatal depression: prevalence of high risk across obstetric services in Western Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Tailoring screening protocols for perinatal depression: prevalence of high risk across obstetric services in Western Australia
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00737-009-0048-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janette Brooks, Elizabeth Nathan, Craig Speelman, Delphin Swalm, Angela Jacques, Dorota Doherty

Abstract

Given what appears to be an ever-increasing list of concerning consequences of perinatal depression, longitudinal studies have much to offer when considering the timing and efficacy of prevention and intervention strategies. The course of depressive symptomatology across the perinatal period at four obstetric services was investigated utilising Western Australian data collected as part of the beyondblue National Postnatal Depression Program. Pregnant women completed one or two Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) assessments during pregnancy and a demographic and psychosocial risk factors questionnaire. One or two EPDS assessments were administered within 12 months postpartum. Prevalence of high risk scores across gestational ages ranged from 14% to 5% during pregnancy and 6% to 9% in the postnatal period. For women who were screened twice, the prevalence of high risk scores appeared earlier and decreased with advancing gestation (p = 0.026). The prevalence of postnatal high risk increased after 12 weeks postpartum (p = 0.029). Screening protocols for depressive symptomatology during pregnancy may need to be fine-tuned across individual hospitals, and take into account gestational ages, in order to be most effective. As depressive symptomatology persists postnatally, screening protocols may need to extend beyond 12 weeks postpartum.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#694
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,289
of 93,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.