↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative thoracic and low back pain following endovascular aortic repair associated with stenting location

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Postoperative thoracic and low back pain following endovascular aortic repair associated with stenting location
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00540-018-2586-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirotsugu Miyoshi, Hiroshi Hamada, Ryuji Nakamura, Takashi Kondo, Toshimichi Yasuda, Noboru Saeki, Masashi Kawamoto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Other 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Sports and Recreations 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,552,610
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#430
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,536
of 437,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.