↓ Skip to main content

Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
377 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1193-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Trzeciak, Jonathan V. McCoy, R. Phillip Dellinger, Ryan C. Arnold, Michael Rizzuto, Nicole L. Abate, Nathan I. Shapiro, Joseph E. Parrillo, Steven M. Hollenberg, on behalf of the Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock (MARS) investigators

Abstract

Sepsis mortality is closely linked to multi-organ failure, and impaired microcirculatory blood flow is thought to be pivotal in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced organ failure. We hypothesized that changes in microcirculatory flow during resuscitation are associated with changes in organ failure over the first 24 h of sepsis therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 246 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Postgraduate 28 11%
Other 27 10%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Other 83 32%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 43 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,615
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,111
of 81,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.