↓ Skip to main content

Recent advances in oral delivery of peptide hormones

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent advances in oral delivery of peptide hormones
Published in
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, February 2016
DOI 10.1517/17425247.2016.1142526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pegah Varamini, Istvan Toth

Abstract

Oral delivery of therapeutic peptide hormones offers the promise of greater patient compliance when compared to parenteral administration routes. However, it is a huge challenge in the pharmaceutical field. Due to increasing demand for oral delivery of peptide hormones such as insulin, gonadotropin-releasing hormones, and calcitonin, various technologies have been explored to overcome the associated hurdles. Areas covered: This review article summarizes the physiological barriers to the oral delivery of peptide hormones and some of the key strategies to circumvent these barriers and enhance peptide hormones' oral bioavailability. In addition, recent advances in oral formulation strategies of peptide hormones, under development and within the clinical trial stages, are discussed. Expert Opinion: The pharmaceutical industry has devoted much effort to develop new, and often complex peptide hormone products based on formulation strategy. Use of the native structure of the peptide hormones in oral formulations could result in an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile. Authors believe that considering chemical modification prior to formulation is essential to achieve orally active products. Although no major breakthrough has been achieved for effective oral delivery of peptides hormones yet, the substantial efforts by industrial and academic laboratories might yield successful results in near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Chemistry 4 9%
Engineering 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,438,457
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
#825
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,802
of 397,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.